|
Our focus in the international trade area is in anti-dumping (AD), where we have performed economic analyses
in matters before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), and the
Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT). Our work in such matters has typically involved critiquing the imposition of countervailing duties (CVD) and anti-dumping duties assessed under U.S. international trade law (Section 337). In addition, we have assisted in valuations in matters
before the U.S. Customs & Border Protection agency.
Precision Economics' international trade consultants have testified before both the U.S. International Trade Commission and
the Canadian International Trade Tribunal regarding anti-dumping duties and countervailing duties. Our economists have also authored "White Papers;"
on specific topics related to international trade law Section 337 practice.
Representative dumping cases where Precision economists have testified include:
Before the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT)
- Baby Food: Canadian International Trade Tribunal Testimony for Respondents (United States, Gerber).
Before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC)
- Canned Pineapple Fruit (Sunset Review): Testimony for Respondents (Thailand);
- Certain Frozen Fish Fillets: ITC Testimony for Respondents (Vietnam);
- Ferrovanadium: ITC Testimony for Respondents (South Africa);
- Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Steel (Sunset Review):
ITC Testimony for Steel Consuming Industry (Brazil, Japan and Russia);
- Solid Urea (Sunset Review): ITC Testimony for Respondents (Russia and Ukraine);
- Steel 201:
ITC Testimony for Respondents (Turkey);
- Titanium Sponge:
ITC Testimony for Respondents (Japan, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine); and
- Uranium: ITC Testimony for Respondents (Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan).
|
