|
Professor Blecherman's writings reflect his interest in the quantitative aspects of management
science, including: using decision theory to model decision-making and to determine the best
course of action in non-deterministic environments; using game theory to model competitive
environments and to develop prescriptive advice for decision-makers; and doing
economic modeling to gain insight into complicated situations where the
quantity and quality of information available to the decision-makers is rapidly changing.
His background as an engineer in the information industry lead him to study how new information
gained from advancing technology impacts individual behavior and business strategy. He is currently a
member of a team of researchers studying the potential impact of the growth of genetic testing on the
health insurance industry. Papers he has co-authored in this area include: "A Simple Pigou Tax
to Address Adverse Selection in Insurance", with David C. Croson of the Wharton School and in
submission to the Journal of Political Economy; and "Information Technology and Information
Asymmetry: The Future of Private Health Insurance", with Eric K. Clemons and David Croson of
the Wharton School and Matt Thatcher of the University of Arizona which was published in the
Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Systems Science.
Professor Blecherman is also a student of the psychology of decision-making. Much of his research
has been focused on understanding the systematic ways in which people fail to make mathematically
optimal decisions. In this area, he has investigated industries as varied as computing and baseball.
A paper derived from his dissertation, "Is there a Winner's Curse in the Market for Baseball
Players", written with Colin Camerer of Cal Tech, has been submitted to the Journal of
Business. This paper explores the market for baseball free agents, finds systematic overpayments to
theseplayers, and uses a theory of cognitive psychology to explain the data. Additionally, Professor
Blecherman has a strong interest in studying negotiations and helping industry arrive at better
outcomes in negotiations with labor, suppliers, customers and other stockholders.
|